Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester United created the clearer chances on xG (3.20 vs 0.33, Δ 2.87).
- Manchester United fired more attempts (27 vs 5 shots).
- Manchester United was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester United | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester United | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 359 | Accurate passes | 377Lead |
| 439 | Total passes | 469Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester United | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester United | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester United | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |