Match statistics snapshot
- Keçiörengücü fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Keçiörengücü was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
- Manisa F.K.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manisa F.k. | Statistic | Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manisa F.k. | Statistic | Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 590Lead | Accurate passes | 263 |
| 664Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manisa F.k. | Statistic | Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manisa F.k. | Statistic | Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manisa F.k. | Statistic | Keçiörengücü |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |