Match statistics snapshot
- Arsenal created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 2.73, Δ 1.37).
- Arsenal fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Arsenal was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mansfield Town | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
1.36 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 2.73Lead |
1 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1 |
11 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
9Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
18 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 19Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mansfield Town | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
192 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
260 | Total passes | 546Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mansfield Town | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mansfield Town | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
4 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 5Lead |
5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mansfield Town | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal leads shot accuracy (+52% vs Mansfield Town)
Arsenal leads shot accuracy (+52% vs Mansfield Town)
Arsenal leads shot quality (+90% vs Mansfield Town)
Arsenal leads box penetration (+46% vs Mansfield Town)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Mansfield Town leads this block
Arsenal — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Mansfield Town leads (0.041 vs 0.041).
Arsenal — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal leads territorial pressure (+57% vs Mansfield Town)
Arsenal leads territorial pressure (+57% vs Mansfield Town)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Arsenal — stronger shot quality allowed
Arsenal — stronger shot quality allowed
Mansfield Town leads keeper workload (+61% vs Arsenal)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Mansfield Town leads (24.0 vs 10.0).
Arsenal leads (56.3 vs 24.4).
Arsenal leads (25.0 vs 15.0).
Arsenal leads (0.144 vs 0.076).
Arsenal leads (92.4 vs 85.6).
Mansfield Town leads (24.0 vs 13.0).