Match statistics snapshot
- Manta FC fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Manta FC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- Barcelona SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Barcelona Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Barcelona Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 168 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 250 | Total passes | 433Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Barcelona Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Barcelona Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Barcelona Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |