Match statistics snapshot
- Emelec created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 2.22, Δ 0.38).
- Manta FC fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Manta FC held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 246 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.