Match statistics snapshot
- Manta FC fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Emelec was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 8%).
- Emelec held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 125 | Accurate passes | 249Lead |
| 217 | Total passes | 335Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |