Match statistics snapshot
- Tecnico Universitario created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 0.89, Δ 0.11).
- Manta FC fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Manta FC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Tecnico Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Tecnico Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Tecnico Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Tecnico Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Tecnico Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.