Match statistics snapshot
- Mantova was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Frosinone held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mantova | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mantova | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 325 | Total passes | 441Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mantova | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mantova | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mantova | Statistic | Frosinone |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |