Match statistics snapshot
- Stellenbosch created the clearer chances on xG (0.34 vs 0.38, Δ 0.04).
- Stellenbosch fired more attempts (8 vs 3 shots).
- Stellenbosch was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Marumo Gallants | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 0.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 3Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Marumo Gallants | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 198Lead |
| 248 | Total passes | 277Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Marumo Gallants | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Marumo Gallants | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Marumo Gallants | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.