Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 0%).
- Masr held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Masr | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Masr | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Masr | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Masr | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Masr | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.