Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 1.70, Δ 1.25).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.