Match statistics snapshot
- Meizhou Kejia created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.94, Δ 0.10).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 355 | Accurate passes | 408Lead |
| 412 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.