Match statistics snapshot
- Meizhou Kejia created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.64, Δ 0.45).
- Meizhou Kejia fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |