Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.67 vs 5.61, Δ 3.94).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (22 vs 14 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 5.61Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 129 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 231 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |