Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 1.92, Δ 0.21).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |