Match statistics snapshot
- Meizhou Kejia created the clearer chances on xG (4.20 vs 0.29, Δ 3.91).
- Meizhou Kejia fired more attempts (29 vs 3 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 25Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 29Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Meizhou Kejia | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.