Match statistics snapshot
- Melbourne City created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 0.30, Δ 1.20).
- Melbourne City held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 250Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 356Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |