Match statistics snapshot
- Ventforet Kofu fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Melbourne City held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Ventforet Kofu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Ventforet Kofu |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 529Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 623Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Ventforet Kofu |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Ventforet Kofu |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Melbourne City | Statistic | Ventforet Kofu |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.