Match statistics snapshot
- Metaloglobus created the clearer chances on xG (1.73 vs 1.25, Δ 0.48).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Metaloglobus was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metaloglobus | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metaloglobus | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 482Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metaloglobus | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metaloglobus | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metaloglobus | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.