Match statistics snapshot
- Angers created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 2.27, Δ 0.56).
- Angers fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Angers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.27Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Angers |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 481Lead | Accurate passes | 387 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 443 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Angers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Angers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 2.13 | Goals prevented | 2.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Angers |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |