Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (26 vs 4 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 14Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 412 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.