Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 1.54, Δ 0.72).
- Lens fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 184 | Accurate passes | 570Lead |
| 276 | Total passes | 648Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.