Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (3.42 vs 1.32, Δ 2.10).
- Metz fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 392 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.91 | Goals prevented | 0.91 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |