Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.78, Δ 0.35).
- Lille fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 635Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 706Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |