Match statistics snapshot
- Lille created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 1.65, Δ 1.02).
- Lille fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 254 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.38 | Goals prevented | 0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.