Match statistics snapshot
- Monaco created the clearer chances on xG (2.17 vs 2.42, Δ 0.25).
- Monaco fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 2.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.42Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 325 | Accurate passes | 658Lead |
| 410 | Total passes | 750Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |