Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.51, Δ 0.33).
- Metz fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 399 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |