Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 1.36, Δ 0.96).
- Metz fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Nice was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 296 | Accurate passes | 716Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 797Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |