Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 0.95, Δ 0.63).
- Nice fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Nice was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95 |
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 351 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 435Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.42 | Goals prevented | -0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |