Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.71, Δ 0.35).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- Reims held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 540Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |