Match statistics snapshot
- Metz created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.40, Δ 0.76).
- Metz fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Strasbourg was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Metz | Statistic | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Metz | Statistic | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 374 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 427 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Metz | Statistic | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Metz | Statistic | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Metz | Statistic | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |