Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.31, Δ 0.06).
- Middlesbrough fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Middlesbrough held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Middlesbrough | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Middlesbrough | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 563Lead | Accurate passes | 461 |
| 642Lead | Total passes | 543 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Middlesbrough | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Middlesbrough | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Middlesbrough | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |