Match statistics snapshot
- Minerva Punjab created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.91, Δ 0.22).
- Goa fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Minerva Punjab was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 259 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.