Match statistics snapshot
- Minerva Punjab created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 0.75, Δ 0.26).
- Minerva Punjab fired more attempts (7 vs 5 shots).
- Minerva Punjab was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Northeast United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Northeast United |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 245Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 316Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Northeast United |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Northeast United |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minerva Punjab | Statistic | Northeast United |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |