Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 0.80, Δ 0.91).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Minnesota United FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 338Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 375 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.99 | Goals prevented | 0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |