Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.64, Δ 0.52).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |