Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.44, Δ 0.67).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 548Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |