Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.14, Δ 0.22).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Minnesota United FC was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 438Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.24 | Goals prevented | -1.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.