Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.73 vs 0.62, Δ 1.11).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (27 vs 7 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 14Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |