Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 1.32, Δ 1.16).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Orlando City SC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 289 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 358 | Total passes | 455Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |