Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 2.52, Δ 1.29).
- San Diego fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Minnesota United FC was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.52Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 571Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 654Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.61 | Goals prevented | -0.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Minnesota United Fc | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.