Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 0.89, Δ 0.49).
- Ceara fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 385 |
| 480Lead | Total passes | 431 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.79 | Goals prevented | -1.79 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |