Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (2.72 vs 0.42, Δ 2.30).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 2.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 385 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 445 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.