Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (2.58 vs 2.18, Δ 0.40).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.18 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 293 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.93 | Goals prevented | 0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.