Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 0.28, Δ 1.88).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 319Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 394Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.18 | Goals prevented | 0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.