Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.80, Δ 0.67).
- Remo fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 474Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |