Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (2.97 vs 0.45, Δ 2.52).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 350 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.40 | Goals prevented | 0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |