Match statistics snapshot
- Mito Hollyhock created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.72, Δ 0.61).
- Mito Hollyhock fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Mito Hollyhock was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Jef United Chiba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Jef United Chiba |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 419Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Jef United Chiba |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Jef United Chiba |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Jef United Chiba |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |