Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 2.65, Δ 1.87).
- Kashima fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Kashima held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.65Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 186 | Accurate passes | 569Lead |
| 268 | Total passes | 667Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.