Match statistics snapshot
- Mito Hollyhock fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Kashiwa Reysol was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
- Mito Hollyhock held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 428Lead | Accurate passes | 354 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Kashiwa Reysol |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.